Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s upcoming trip to Washington arrives at a defining moment for U.S. policy in the Middle East. The visit is not just about repairing a difficult relationship; it is about how the United States adapts to a region where Saudi Arabia is no longer a junior partner, Israel is facing unprecedented security and diplomatic pressures, and outside powers like China and Russia are playing a growing role.
With the Biden administration reassessing its approach to Iran, energy security, and regional stability, Riyadh’s choices are increasingly central. The crown prince’s visit will help determine whether the United States can still organize a broad coalition to contain Tehran, prevent regional escalation, and promote a more integrated, cooperative Middle East-and how Israel fits into that evolving picture.
This article explores why MBS’s Washington visit matters now, what it reveals about the future of U.S.-Saudi relations, and how it will influence Israel’s security environment, regional alignments, and the broader agenda of organizations like the American Jewish Committee (AJC) that seek a safer, more stable Middle East.
MBS in Washington: A New Phase in US-Saudi Relations and Middle East Power Balance
For U.S. officials, Mohammed bin Salman’s arrival underscores that the traditional bargain-American security guarantees in exchange for reliable oil supplies-is being replaced by a far more complex strategic negotiation. Washington now confronts a Saudi leadership that wants:
- Firm American security guarantees
- Cutting-edge defense systems
- Civilian nuclear cooperation
-all while preserving greater freedom of action in oil markets and foreign policy, including growing ties with China and Russia.
In this shifting landscape, the United States must decide how much it is prepared to offer to keep Saudi Arabia anchored in a U.S.-led orbit, at a time when the global system is moving toward a more multipolar order and Gulf states are experimenting with diversified partnerships.
Key areas on the agenda include:
- Security: Long-term defense arrangements, access to advanced weapons, and joint planning against shared threats.
- Energy: Coordination on oil output, investment in the global energy transition, and resilience against supply shocks.
- Regional diplomacy: Saudi roles in de-escalating tensions with Iran, managing conflicts, and engaging with Israel.
- Technology: Frameworks for nuclear energy, AI collaboration, and cybersecurity partnerships with clear safeguards.
| Key Actor | Primary Goal | Strategic Concern |
|---|---|---|
| United States | Preserve regional influence | Great-power competition with China |
| Saudi Arabia | Security guarantees & modernization | Avoid dependence on any single patron |
| Israel | Normalization with Riyadh | Maintaining qualitative military edge |
At a regional level, the visit will test how effectively Washington can channel Saudi ambitions into a stabilizing-rather than destabilizing-force from the Gulf to the Eastern Mediterranean. A more assertive Saudi Arabia creates opportunities for:
- Expanded Arab-Israeli normalization
- Cross-border trade and infrastructure corridors
- Coordinated efforts to deter Iran and its proxies
Yet it also raises sensitive questions about human rights standards, the parameters of arms sales, and the extent of U.S. nuclear cooperation with Riyadh. Decisions taken in these talks will broadcast to regional governments whether Washington still sets the framework for security and diplomacy in the Middle East or must increasingly negotiate with partners that have credible alternatives and are willing to leverage them.
Implications for Israel: Saudi Calculus, Security Architecture, and Deterrence
For Israel, Saudi Arabia’s evolving strategy turns long-debated hypotheticals into immediate policy choices. A U.S.-brokered package that offers Riyadh defense guarantees, nuclear cooperation, and wide-ranging economic benefits will inevitably reshape Israel’s security environment.
A Saudi Arabia that feels more secure under a U.S. umbrella could intensify behind-the-scenes coordination with Israel, including intelligence sharing and regional defense cooperation. However, if not carefully structured, the same framework could raise Saudi expectations on the Palestinian issue and harden the conditions Riyadh sets for full normalization.
From Jerusalem’s perspective, several questions are paramount:
- How far will Saudi Arabia go on normalization with Israel?
- What level of U.S. security commitment will Riyadh obtain?
- Will Iran see any deal as an escalation or as a containment mechanism?
The answers will shape Israel’s risk assessments from Gaza and the West Bank to the Red Sea, the Arabian Peninsula, and beyond.
- Security architecture: Potential integration of Saudi radar, air defense, and missile capabilities into a wider regional network, improving early warning and response against Iranian threats.
- Normalization trajectory: A phased roadmap-such as overflight rights, trade offices, and eventually embassies-linked to U.S. guarantees and progress on sensitive files.
- Deterrence signaling: Coordinated U.S.-Saudi-Israeli messaging to Tehran and its proxies to clarify red lines and the costs of escalation.
| Saudi Priority | Israeli Concern | Policy Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Civil nuclear deal | Regional proliferation | Tighter U.S. safeguards |
| Defense treaty | Freedom of action vs. Iran | Clear U.S. red lines |
| Palestinian concessions | Security control on the ground | Phased, verifiable steps |
As Riyadh sharpens its negotiating position in Washington, Israel’s room for miscalculation narrows. The Saudi insistence on linking major defense and economic benefits to measurable progress on the Palestinian issue injects additional complexity into any normalization pathway, but it does not close the door.
For Israeli decision-makers, the challenge is to harness shared interests with Saudi Arabia and the United States-such as containing Iran and promoting economic connectivity-without allowing Israel’s deterrence posture to appear outsourced to a broader American-Saudi framework. If carefully crafted, the emerging alignment could reinforce Israel’s qualitative military edge and expand its regional partnerships. But the same arrangements that bolster stability in the short term will also define the constraints, expectations, and leverage points in future crises.
Human Rights, Energy, and Technology: The Biden Administration’s Core Dilemmas
The Biden administration faces a difficult balancing act as it considers deeper cooperation with Saudi Arabia. Washington must simultaneously manage:
- Domestic and international pressure on human rights
- The persistent need for energy security
- The disruptive impact of emerging technologies
MBS’s visit places renewed focus on whether the United States is prepared to prioritize lower oil prices, strategic alignment against Iran, and competition with China over accountability for political repression, the treatment of activists and dissidents, and the unresolved legacy of Jamal Khashoggi’s murder.
At the same time, Saudi Arabia’s ambition to become a regional hub for AI, data centers, surveillance technologies, and “smart city” megaprojects raises urgent questions about the role of U.S.-made tools. These technologies can either accelerate economic diversification and connectivity-or strengthen digital authoritarianism and transnational repression.
Inside the administration, these issues are converging into a set of policy tradeoffs that will shape not just U.S.-Saudi ties, but Israel’s strategic environment and the broader regional order. Among the policy choices under active discussion are:
- Calibrating arms and cyber exports so that advanced systems enhance deterrence and counterterrorism without enabling internal crackdowns or aggressive regional behavior.
- Conditioning energy and technology cooperation on observable improvements in due process, transparency of legal proceedings, and space for civil society.
- Coordinating with Israel and moderate Arab partners so that new energy routes, digital infrastructure, and logistics corridors promote integration rather than entrench rival blocs.
| Policy Lever | Opportunity | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Deals | Stabilize prices, fund regional projects | Undercut rights conditionality |
| Tech Partnerships | Shape AI and cyber norms | Export-enabled surveillance |
| Security Guarantees | Build deterrence vs. Iran | Deeper U.S. entanglement |
As global demand for energy and digital infrastructure continues to grow-with Middle Eastern oil still comprising a significant share of world supply and data traffic surging across the region-these decisions will have compounding effects on how power, information, and influence are distributed.
Strategic Path Forward for Washington: Advancing US Interests and Israeli Security
The Biden administration can use Mohammed bin Salman’s visit to shift from tactical crisis management to a more structured, long-term framework with Riyadh. Rather than exchanging concessions for short-lived gains, Washington has an opportunity to build an upgraded partnership that ties Saudi benefits to clear standards on security, technology, and regional diplomacy.
To advance U.S. interests while strengthening Israel’s security, policymakers should prioritize:
- Deepening security cooperation with verifiable metrics
- Embedding Israel in emerging Gulf defense and economic architectures
- Aligning economic incentives with political and security commitments
Congressional oversight will be central to ensuring that any long-term security arrangements are sustainable, credible to allies, and resilient across future U.S. administrations-an especially important signal for Israel and other regional partners.
Key steps could include:
- Condition advanced defense transfers on sustained counterterrorism collaboration, non-proliferation guarantees, and clear limits on how systems can be used domestically and regionally.
- Link Saudi access to U.S. civilian nuclear cooperation to strict safeguards, intrusive monitoring mechanisms, and steady but discreet movement toward normalization with Israel.
- Leverage regional forums to expand trilateral U.S.-Saudi-Israeli exercises focused on air and missile defense, maritime security in chokepoints like the Red Sea and Strait of Hormuz, and cyber resilience.
- Design economic incentives that support Saudi Vision 2030 while directing capital into cross-border infrastructure, logistics, and digital projects that visibly include Israel and its new partners in the Abraham Accords and beyond.
| U.S. Move | Saudi Signal | Benefit to Israel |
|---|---|---|
| Structured defense pact | Formal de-escalation pledges | Reduced northern and Gulf threats |
| Nuclear cooperation with safeguards | Transparency on enrichment | Lower proliferation risk |
| Support for regional infrastructure | Open trade corridors | New markets and connectivity |
By embedding such conditions and benefits in a coherent strategy, Washington can help shape a regional order where Saudi Arabia is an engine of stability, Israel is more fully integrated, and shared threats are managed through collective deterrence rather than ad hoc coalitions.
The Way Forward
Mohammed bin Salman’s visit to Washington highlights just how dramatically the Middle East has changed in recent years-and how central Saudi Arabia has become to U.S. calculations on security, energy, and diplomacy. For Israel, the implications are equally far-reaching: progress on normalization with Riyadh, participation in a U.S.-backed regional security network, and tighter coordination against common adversaries will all be shaped by what is agreed in these meetings.
For American policymakers and the broader Jewish community, this moment calls for a sober, strategic approach. It means weighing the promise of transformative regional arrangements against enduring challenges: Iran’s nuclear and regional activities, the unresolved Palestinian question, and ongoing human rights concerns inside the Kingdom.
The decisions made now will influence not only the trajectory of U.S.-Saudi ties, but also the parameters of Israel’s security and diplomacy for years to come. As the Biden administration charts its course, the American Jewish Committee and other stakeholders will be looking beyond symbolism-seeking concrete, durable commitments that reinforce U.S. interests, strengthen Israel’s security, and move the Middle East toward greater stability and, in time, a more sustainable and inclusive peace.
